Advanced search
    LIU Yu, XU Huan-wen, JIANG Jing, LIU Gui-feng.. Family selection of birch tetraploid half-sibling based on seed vigor and seedling growth traits.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2014, 36(2): 74-80.
    Citation: LIU Yu, XU Huan-wen, JIANG Jing, LIU Gui-feng.. Family selection of birch tetraploid half-sibling based on seed vigor and seedling growth traits.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2014, 36(2): 74-80.

    Family selection of birch tetraploid half-sibling based on seed vigor and seedling growth traits.

    More Information
    • Published Date: March 30, 2014
    • In this experiment, we compared tetraploid-and diploid-families of birch in seed and seedling quality. Seeds of 23 half-sib families (18 tetraploid-and 5 diploid-families) were collected from a seed orchard and their seedlings were grown in a nursery. The measured traits included thousand-seed weight, germination potential, germination rate,vigor index, seedling height and ground diameter. The results showed that: there were significant (P 0.01) family effects for all studied traits. On average, the thousand-seed weight of triploid-families was 22.42% higher than that of diploid-families. While the tetraploid Q53 half-sibling family showed the highest germination potential (56.67%) and vigor index (37.62), all other tetraploid-families displayed lower values than diploid ones. For seedling height, the diploid-families were taller than the tetraploid ones; the top three families were all diploid-families and the tallest one, the diploid-family CK1, was 31.04% higher than other families. The ground diameter growth, however, showed a reversal pattern, with most of the top-ranking families being tetraploid-families. Based on the results of principal component analysis, tetraploid-families Q53, Q65, Q13 and Q27 were identified as the superior families. We recommend the seed trees of these families as preferred seed trees in the future establishment of triploid seed production gardens.
    • Related Articles

      [1]Zhang Feifei, Zhu Yan, Han Changzhi. Analysis of chloroplast genome codon preference in Camellia meiocarpa and Camellia vietnamensis[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20240200
      [2]Luo Yongjian, Wang Ru, Zhao Renfei, Lu Xinxiong, Yin Guangkun, Deng Zhijun. Analysis of synonymous codon usage bias in the chloroplast genome of Davidia involucrata[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46(3): 8-16. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220199
      [3]Cui Yanhong, Li Ling, Bai Qian, Yang Qing, Su Shuchai. Identification and expression analysis during ovule development of Hsp90 gene family in Castanea mollissima[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2022, 44(11): 10-19. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210272
      [4]Song Tingting, Liang Nansong, Lü Yipin, Cui Jinghong, Yu Lei, Zhao Fujiang, Xu Liang, Zhan Yaguang. Identification and expression analysis of FmPLT gene family of Fraxinus mandschurica[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2022, 44(2): 11-21. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210105
      [5]Wang Xue, Song Shuang, Li Meiyu, Bo Wenhao, Li Yingyue, Pang Xiaoming, Cao Ming. Identification and expression analysis based on RNA-Seq of the pectin methylesterase gene family in Ziziphus jujuba[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(4): 8-16. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200338
      [6]ZHAO Li-hong, ZHOU Fei, GUAN Min-xiao, LIU Chuang, ZHAO Xin, LIU Xue-mei. Analysis of differentially expressed transcripts in early and middle development of Betula platyphylla female inflorescence[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(4): 104-112. DOI: DOI:10.13332/j.1000-1522.20140301
      [7]LI Hao-yang, SHI Yang, DING Ya-na, XU Ji-chen.. Bioinformatics analysis of expansin gene family in poplar genome.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2014, 36(2): 59-67.
      [8]GUAN Feng-ying, DENG Wang-hua, FAN Shao-hui. Spectral characteristics of Phyllostachys pubescens stand and its differential analysis with typical vegetation[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2012, 34(3): 31-35.
      [9]XU Xiao, XU Qian, ZHANG Kai, XU Ji-chen. Advancements in expansin genes of plants.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(5): 154-162.
      [10]XU Xiao, HUANG Bing-ru, XU Ji-chen. Analysis of AsEXP1 gene related to drought tolerance in creeping bentgrass[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(5): 126-131.
    • Cited by

      Periodical cited type(6)

      1. 宋学雨,简尊吉,王少博,党英侨,魏可,王小艺,肖文发. 松材线虫入侵对湖北三峡地区马尾松林水源涵养能力的影响. 林业科学研究. 2024(01): 10-20 .
      2. 黄金莲,崔鸿侠,唐万鹏,胡琛,马致远,雷静品. 虫害对华山松人工林土壤酶活性及碳氮磷化学计量特征的影响. 林业科学. 2023(10): 128-137 .
      3. 周岚,巫大宇,吕秋实,李贤伟,苏宇,郭茂金,尹海锋,吕倩. 松材线虫侵染的马尾松人工林细根形态及生物量分异特征. 生态学报. 2022(15): 6274-6286 .
      4. 高瑞贺,骆有庆,石娟. 松材线虫入侵对马尾松树光合特性的影响. 林业科学研究. 2019(01): 65-73 .
      5. Ruihe Gao,Youqing Luo,Zhuang Wang,Hanjun Yu,Juan Shi. Patterns of biomass, carbon, and nitrogen storage distribution dynamics after the invasion of pine forests by Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae) in the three Gorges Reservoir Region. Journal of Forestry Research. 2018(02): 459-470 .
      6. 宋秀虎. 寄生线虫入侵对恩施州园林植物平面构成的拓扑性质影响分析. 科技通报. 2016(10): 63-67 .

      Other cited types(4)

    Catalog

      Article views (1396) PDF downloads (196) Cited by(10)

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return